Google I/O 2009 – Google’s HTML 5 Work: What’s Next?
July 28, 2009 - 2:35 pm
Google I/O 2009 – Google’s HTML 5 Work: What’s Next?
Matthew Papakipos
Learn about new features in HTML 5 that enhance and enrich the web experience. Learn about new features in HTML 5, how they’ll be supported in Chrome, and our latest plans for new functionality. The web browser is quickly evolving into a rich platform with access to all the capabilities that your computer has to offer. This talk will help you understand what is possible and how to write applications that use the latest APIs.
For presentation slides and all I/O sessions, please go to: code.google.com/events/io/sessions.html
Duration : 1:1:55
[youtube AusOPz8Ww80]
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
nerds
nerds
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
woot go google keep …
woot go google keep going love your stuff woot keep doing such a good job
love you google
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
google please make …
google please make chrome and youtube into html5
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Yes, without doubt …
Yes, without doubt sounds much better only ‘controls’ than ‘controls=”true”‘, checkbox have that problem, you can put: ‘checked=”checked”‘ or ‘checked=”true”‘ but sounds weird the first way.
The main problem is that is not human-readable but in the past that was a major problem with html broken, developers just made anything of shortcuts which work on a particular browser but not on all, that is why I like more xhtml even their weirdness on those special cases =)
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
first of all it …
first of all it would be Control=”true”
secondly html is a depricated standard.
and has been replaced with XHTML which is xml
and even in html 4.0 its recomented to use proper atributes and close all tags.
html/sgml belongs ot the dark ages!
We have progressed to xhtml and i’ll fight anyone tooth and nail to hinder this madness from spreading now that we are finaly progressing forward!
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Do you really think …
Do you really think that “controls=true” or somethinglike that is better than just saying “controls”.
I think it’s much more natural to put only “controls”, and much more human-readable.
I understand that XML doesn’t support valueless attributes. But HTML is not XML (and there are other markup languajes with different syntaxes
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Google is not the …
Google is not the one inventing HTML 5. HTML 5 is being developed jointly by WHATWG and the W3C HTML 5 Working Group, which does include Google, but also every single major browser vendor and several other high-level technology companies.
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
HTML 5 can be …
HTML 5 can be served as XML depending on the mime type. This is called XHTML 5.
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
the video tag …
the video tag syntax was disgracefull!
attributes without values!
the internet does not need to be draged back into the sgml stoneage its just escaped!
give me pure strickt semantic xhtml or give me death!
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!! …
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!
Fithy!!! Disgusting!!!
Unaccpetable!
“controls autoplay”
attributes should never be empty of a value!
are they purposfully trying to revert to the dark ages of sgml?!
Grrrr!
Cant these idiots stop ruining the net!
I am tired of this idiot stoneage code going around!
Proper god code conventions and standards or get the of the net!
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
the name html 5 i …
the name html 5 i feel is Heresy most foul…
html was depricated..
another name entierly would be desirable.
For me html represent the dark ages of standard wars, table layout and slopy disgusting code full of unclosed tags.
and SGML! URK! blasted disgusting SGML!
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
No, same here. Not …
No, same here. Not all I/O talks have the issue, but this one does.
July 28th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Is it just my …
Is it just my computer or is the sound terrible for everyone? The sound is heavily distorted and I can’t normally listen to the talk like this.